
The Bundestag recently discussed a motion by the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in a topical debate. The parliamentary group is demanding the withdrawal of cannabis legalization. The CDU/CSU is highly critical of the partial legalization that has been in force since 1 April 2024 and has announced that it will revoke it if it comes to power.
Why the Union is against legalization
Friedrich Merz, Chairman of the CDU, said:
“Organized crime would be promoted by the release of cannabis, as would gang crime.”
It also underlines the threat to internal security. This assessment is shared by the German Medical Association, which points to health risks and calls for stricter regulation.
You can find out more about the criticism of the German Medical Association and the demand to withdraw legalization here.
The most important arguments of the critics:
- Organized crime is being strengthened.
- Health risks from cannabis use.
- Negative effects on internal security.
The view of the traffic light coalition
Legalization is defended by the SPD, the Greens and the FDP . In their view, the measure leads to a long overdue decriminalization of consumers and helps to curb the black market.
According to Federal Health Minister Karl Lauterbach, the legalization law is subject to clear restrictions, in particular to ensure the protection of minors.
Further advocacy points - such as the fact that cannabis promotes thinking skills and can have rejuvenating effects - can be found here.
Advantages that the government emphasizes:
- Relief for the judiciary and police through decriminalization
- Curbing illegal trade routes
- Clear regulations to protect young people
A divided country
The debate reveals deep social and political differences in Germany. Proponents of legalization argue for personal responsibility and freedom, while opponents focus their arguments on the long-term health and social consequences.
A conclusion with an open outcome
Whether or not legalization will finally come to fruition depends heavily on political developments over the next few years. The discussion illustrates how different the priorities of the parties are on this issue.
Source: